Some checks failed
Deploy to GitHub Pages / Deploy to GitHub Pages (push) Has been cancelled
- Based on working minting_plan repository - Configured for threefold.info/economics deployment - Added ops documentation for server deployment - Updated baseUrl and URL configuration
450 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
450 lines
13 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
sidebar_position: 3
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# Pricing Model & Income Analysis
|
||
|
||
Understanding the economics of farming is essential for making informed hardware decisions. This page breaks down pricing, utilization scenarios, and ROI calculations.
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Pricing Components
|
||
|
||
### Per-Slice Pricing Structure
|
||
|
||
Each slice has two key price points:
|
||
|
||
**Minimum Price** (Floor):
|
||
- Conservative market pricing
|
||
- Ensures farmers can cover costs
|
||
- Competitive with major cloud providers at bulk rates
|
||
- Assumes moderate demand
|
||
|
||
**Maximum Price** (Ceiling):
|
||
- Premium positioning
|
||
- Comparable to retail cloud pricing
|
||
- Assumes high demand and full utilization
|
||
- Competitive advantage scenarios
|
||
|
||
**Example: Standard Compute Slice**
|
||
- Min: 1.2 CC/month (~$0.15)
|
||
- Max: 12.0 CC/month (~$1.54)
|
||
- Range: 10x spread between floor and ceiling
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Revenue Share Breakdown
|
||
|
||
Every Cloud Credit (CC) spent on TFGrid capacity is distributed as follows:
|
||
|
||
```mermaid
|
||
pie title Revenue Distribution per 100 CC
|
||
"Farmer (You!)" : 80
|
||
"TFT Burn (Deflationary)" : 10
|
||
"ThreeFold Operations" : 10
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### What This Means
|
||
|
||
If a user pays **100 CC** for your slices:
|
||
|
||
| Recipient | Amount | Purpose |
|
||
|-----------|--------|---------|
|
||
| **Farmer** | 80 CC | Your income |
|
||
| **TFT Burn** | 10 CC | Reduces TFT supply → supports token value |
|
||
| **ThreeFold** | 10 CC | Platform development, operations, support |
|
||
|
||
:::tip Farmer-First Model
|
||
With 80% going directly to farmers, you keep the vast majority of value generated by your infrastructure.
|
||
:::
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Income Scenarios by Node Type
|
||
|
||
### Scenario Analysis Framework
|
||
|
||
We analyze three utilization scenarios for each node:
|
||
|
||
1. **Conservative** (20-30% utilization): Network still growing
|
||
2. **Moderate** (50-60% utilization): Healthy network adoption
|
||
3. **Optimistic** (80-100% utilization): High demand period
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Example: Mini 3 (Certified Node)
|
||
|
||
**Hardware Investment**: $1,000
|
||
**Monthly HW Cost**: 17 CC
|
||
**Maximum Slices**: 25
|
||
**Typical Active Slices**: 25 (can provide full 25)
|
||
|
||
#### Conservative Scenario (30% utilization, min pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 25 × 30% = 7.5 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 1.5 CC (minimum)
|
||
Gross Income: 7.5 × 1.5 = 11.25 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 9 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 9 - 17 = -8 CC/month (not profitable yet)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Needs higher utilization or pricing to be profitable
|
||
|
||
#### Moderate Scenario (60% utilization, mid pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 25 × 60% = 15 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 7.5 CC (midpoint)
|
||
Gross Income: 15 × 7.5 = 112.5 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 90 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 90 - 17 = 73 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 73 × 12 = 876 CC (~$112/year)
|
||
ROI: $1,000 investment / $112/year = 8.9 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Profitable but slow ROI
|
||
|
||
#### Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 25 × 100% = 25 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 14.9 CC (maximum)
|
||
Gross Income: 25 × 14.9 = 372.5 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 298 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 298 - 17 = 281 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 281 × 12 = 3,372 CC (~$432/year)
|
||
ROI: $1,000 investment / $432/year = 2.3 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Excellent ROI with strong demand
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Example: Large TFGrid Node
|
||
|
||
**Hardware Investment**: $2,000
|
||
**Monthly HW Cost**: 33 CC
|
||
**Maximum Slices**: 100
|
||
**Typical Active Slices**: 20 (limited by resource balance)
|
||
|
||
#### Conservative Scenario (25% utilization, min pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 20 × 25% = 5 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 7.6 CC (minimum)
|
||
Gross Income: 5 × 7.6 = 38 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 30.4 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 30.4 - 33 = -2.6 CC/month (slight loss)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Nearly break-even at low utilization
|
||
|
||
#### Moderate Scenario (50% utilization, mid pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 20 × 50% = 10 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 40 CC (midpoint)
|
||
Gross Income: 10 × 40 = 400 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 320 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 320 - 33 = 287 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 287 × 12 = 3,444 CC (~$441/year)
|
||
ROI: $2,000 investment / $441/year = 4.5 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Solid profitability
|
||
|
||
#### Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 20 × 100% = 20 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 76.2 CC (maximum)
|
||
Gross Income: 20 × 76.2 = 1,524 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 1,219 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 1,219 - 33 = 1,186 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 1,186 × 12 = 14,232 CC (~$1,822/year)
|
||
ROI: $2,000 investment / $1,822/year = 1.1 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Outstanding ROI
|
||
|
||
:::tip High-Memory Advantage
|
||
Large TFGrid Node's 512 GB RAM enables premium memory-heavy slice pricing, driving higher income per active slice.
|
||
:::
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
### Example: Nvidia 6000 (Dual GPU)
|
||
|
||
**Hardware Investment**: $30,000
|
||
**Monthly HW Cost**: 500 CC
|
||
**Maximum Slices**: 2 (dedicated GPU slices)
|
||
**Typical Active Slices**: 2
|
||
|
||
#### Conservative Scenario (50% utilization, min pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 2 × 50% = 1 slice
|
||
Price per Slice: 300 CC (minimum)
|
||
Gross Income: 1 × 300 = 300 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 240 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 240 - 500 = -260 CC/month (loss)
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Needs higher utilization for profitability
|
||
|
||
#### Moderate Scenario (75% utilization, mid pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 2 × 75% = 1.5 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 1,650 CC (midpoint)
|
||
Gross Income: 1.5 × 1,650 = 2,475 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 1,980 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 1,980 - 500 = 1,480 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 1,480 × 12 = 17,760 CC (~$2,273/year)
|
||
ROI: $30,000 investment / $2,273/year = 13.2 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Profitable but requires patience
|
||
|
||
#### Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
|
||
|
||
```
|
||
Active Slices: 2 × 100% = 2 slices
|
||
Price per Slice: 3,000 CC (maximum)
|
||
Gross Income: 2 × 3,000 = 6,000 CC/month
|
||
Your Share (80%): 4,800 CC/month
|
||
Net Profit: 4,800 - 500 = 4,300 CC/month
|
||
Annual Profit: 4,300 × 12 = 51,600 CC (~$6,605/year)
|
||
ROI: $30,000 investment / $6,605/year = 4.5 years
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
**Status**: Excellent returns with AI demand
|
||
|
||
:::note AI Premium Pricing
|
||
GPU nodes can command significantly higher prices due to AI/ML demand. Market pricing for comparable GPU cloud instances supports these ranges.
|
||
:::
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Income Comparison: All Nodes at 50% Utilization
|
||
|
||
Assuming **50% utilization** and **mid-point pricing**:
|
||
|
||
| Node Type | HW Cost | Monthly Net | Annual Net | ROI (Years) | Annual % Return |
|
||
|-----------|---------|-------------|------------|-------------|-----------------|
|
||
| 3Node Home | $500 | ~35 CC | ~420 CC | ~10 | ~10% |
|
||
| Large TFGrid | $2,000 | ~287 CC | ~3,444 CC | ~4.5 | ~22% |
|
||
| Large TFGrid 2 | $1,200 | ~100 CC | ~1,200 CC | ~8 | ~12.5% |
|
||
| Mini 1 | $350 | ~30 CC | ~360 CC | ~8 | ~12.5% |
|
||
| Mini 2 | $800 | ~60 CC | ~720 CC | ~9 | ~11% |
|
||
| Mini 3 | $1,000 | ~73 CC | ~876 CC | ~9 | ~11% |
|
||
| Mini AI 1 | $2,000 | ~140 CC | ~1,680 CC | ~9.5 | ~10.5% |
|
||
| Nvidia 6000 1x | $15,000 | ~875 CC | ~10,500 CC | ~11.4 | ~8.8% |
|
||
| Nvidia 6000 2x | $30,000 | ~1,480 CC | ~17,760 CC | ~13.5 | ~7.4% |
|
||
| Tenstorrent 8x | $30,000 | ~1,480 CC | ~17,760 CC | ~13.5 | ~7.4% |
|
||
|
||
*CC values converted to USD at $0.128/CC for ROI calculations*
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Key Factors Affecting Income
|
||
|
||
### 1. Network Utilization
|
||
|
||
**What drives it**:
|
||
- Total TFGrid capacity available
|
||
- Number of active users/applications
|
||
- Seasonal demand fluctuations
|
||
- Marketing and ecosystem growth
|
||
|
||
**Your influence**:
|
||
- Limited direct control
|
||
- Participate in community promotion
|
||
- Ensure node uptime and reliability
|
||
|
||
### 2. Pricing Strategy
|
||
|
||
**Competitive considerations**:
|
||
- AWS, GCP, Azure pricing benchmarks
|
||
- Other TFGrid farmers' pricing
|
||
- Your node's specifications (certified vs. non-certified)
|
||
- Geographic location / latency advantages
|
||
|
||
**Your influence**:
|
||
- Set competitive pricing when marketplace allows
|
||
- Offer discounts for long-term commitments
|
||
- Premium pricing for certified or high-spec nodes
|
||
|
||
### 3. Node Uptime & Reliability
|
||
|
||
**Impact**:
|
||
- Downtime = no income during that period
|
||
- Poor reliability = lost customers
|
||
- Consistent uptime = reputation and repeat business
|
||
|
||
**Your influence**:
|
||
- Invest in quality hardware
|
||
- Ensure stable internet connection
|
||
- Monitor and maintain proactively
|
||
- Use UPS/backup power if possible
|
||
|
||
### 4. Resource Balance
|
||
|
||
**What matters**:
|
||
- Nodes limited by weakest resource (CPU, RAM, or storage)
|
||
- Well-balanced nodes can sell more slices
|
||
- Bottlenecks reduce effective slice count
|
||
|
||
**Your influence**:
|
||
- Choose balanced hardware configurations
|
||
- Consider upgrading bottlenecks (e.g., add RAM)
|
||
- Understand which resource constrains your node
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## ROI Sensitivities
|
||
|
||
### Utilization Impact
|
||
|
||
For a **Mini 3** node ($1,000 investment):
|
||
|
||
| Utilization | Monthly Net Profit | Annual Profit | ROI Years |
|
||
|-------------|-------------------|---------------|-----------|
|
||
| 20% | -8 CC | -96 CC | Never (loss) |
|
||
| 30% | 9 CC | 108 CC | 74 years |
|
||
| 40% | 45 CC | 540 CC | 14.8 years |
|
||
| 50% | 73 CC | 876 CC | 9.1 years |
|
||
| 60% | 109 CC | 1,308 CC | 6.1 years |
|
||
| 80% | 181 CC | 2,172 CC | 3.7 years |
|
||
| 100% | 253 CC | 3,036 CC | 2.6 years |
|
||
|
||
*Assumes mid-point pricing at all utilization levels*
|
||
|
||
### Pricing Impact
|
||
|
||
For a **Large TFGrid Node** ($2,000 investment) at **50% utilization**:
|
||
|
||
| Price Point | Monthly Net Profit | Annual Profit | ROI Years |
|
||
|-------------|-------------------|---------------|-----------|
|
||
| Minimum | 99 CC | 1,188 CC | 13.4 years |
|
||
| 25th percentile | 420 CC | 5,040 CC | 3.2 years |
|
||
| Midpoint | 287 CC | 3,444 CC | 4.6 years |
|
||
| 75th percentile | 756 CC | 9,072 CC | 1.8 years |
|
||
| Maximum | 1,186 CC | 14,232 CC | 1.1 years |
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Comparative Cloud Pricing
|
||
|
||
To validate our pricing model, here's how TFGrid compares to major cloud providers:
|
||
|
||
### Standard Compute Instance
|
||
|
||
**TFGrid Standard Slice**:
|
||
- 2 cores, 4 GB RAM, ~140 GB SSD
|
||
- Price: 1.2 - 12.0 CC/month ($0.15 - $1.54/month)
|
||
- Hourly: $0.005 - $0.05/hour
|
||
|
||
**AWS t3.medium**:
|
||
- 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM
|
||
- Price: ~$30/month (~$0.042/hour)
|
||
|
||
**GCP e2-medium**:
|
||
- 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM
|
||
- Price: ~$24/month (~$0.033/hour)
|
||
|
||
**TFGrid Advantage**: 50-95% cheaper than major clouds at similar specs
|
||
|
||
### AI/GPU Instance
|
||
|
||
**TFGrid AI Slice (Nvidia 6000)**:
|
||
- 24 cores, 124 GB RAM, 96 GB GPU
|
||
- Price: 300 - 3,000 CC/month ($38 - $384/month)
|
||
- Hourly: $0.053 - $0.53/hour
|
||
|
||
**AWS p3.2xlarge** (V100 16GB):
|
||
- 8 vCPUs, 61 GB RAM, 16 GB GPU
|
||
- Price: ~$3.06/hour (~$2,200/month for full-time)
|
||
|
||
**GCP a2-highgpu-1g** (A100 40GB):
|
||
- 12 vCPUs, 85 GB RAM, 40 GB GPU
|
||
- Price: ~$3.67/hour (~$2,640/month for full-time)
|
||
|
||
**TFGrid Advantage**: 80-95% cheaper with larger GPU memory (96 GB vs 16-40 GB)
|
||
|
||
:::tip Competitive Positioning
|
||
Even at maximum pricing, TFGrid undercuts major cloud providers significantly. At minimum pricing, it's dramatically cheaper while providing more resources.
|
||
:::
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Risk Factors & Considerations
|
||
|
||
### Market Risks
|
||
|
||
- **Network adoption rate**: Slower than expected growth delays profitability
|
||
- **Competition**: Other decentralized cloud platforms
|
||
- **Pricing pressure**: Race to the bottom if oversupply occurs
|
||
- **Technology shifts**: New hardware makes existing nodes obsolete faster
|
||
|
||
### Operational Risks
|
||
|
||
- **Electricity costs**: Not included in hardware cost calculations
|
||
- **Internet costs**: Bandwidth charges in some regions
|
||
- **Maintenance**: Hardware failures, replacements
|
||
- **Obsolescence**: 5-year amortization assumes hardware remains competitive
|
||
|
||
### Mitigation Strategies
|
||
|
||
- **Start small**: Test with lower-cost nodes before scaling
|
||
- **Diversify**: Mix node types (standard + AI)
|
||
- **Stay informed**: Active participation in community
|
||
- **Plan for upgrades**: Budget for hardware refresh cycles
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Total Capacity & Market Size
|
||
|
||
Based on ThreeFold's current bid commitments (see [TF Bid Packages](/node-economics/tf-bid-packages)):
|
||
|
||
**Total Potential Market**:
|
||
- ~24,150 slices across all bid types
|
||
- ~$253,800/month at minimum pricing
|
||
- ~$3,965,625/month at maximum pricing
|
||
- ~$507 million annual market at maximum pricing
|
||
|
||
**This represents committed ThreeFold demand**, not total market potential. Additional demand will come from:
|
||
- End-user applications
|
||
- Enterprise offtakers
|
||
- Individual developers and projects
|
||
- Partner ecosystems
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Next Steps
|
||
|
||
### For Potential Farmers
|
||
|
||
1. **Review [Node Specifications](/node-economics/node-specifications)** - Choose hardware based on budget
|
||
2. **Run your own calculations** - Use your local electricity/internet costs
|
||
3. **Start conservative** - Plan for 30-40% utilization initially
|
||
4. **Monitor and adjust** - Track real performance and optimize
|
||
|
||
### For Current Farmers
|
||
|
||
1. **Evaluate upgrade paths** - Consider certified nodes Q4 2025
|
||
2. **Optimize pricing** - Balance competitiveness with profitability
|
||
3. **Improve uptime** - Maximize income from existing hardware
|
||
4. **Plan for AI** - GPU nodes represent significant growth opportunity
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
:::info Living Document
|
||
As the network matures and real utilization data becomes available, these projections will be refined. Join the community to stay updated on actual farmer income reports.
|
||
:::
|
||
|
||
:::tip Questions?
|
||
Discuss pricing strategies and share experiences in the [ThreeFold Forum](https://forum.threefold.io) and [Telegram community](https://t.me/threefoldfarmers).
|
||
:::
|