- Based on working minting_plan repository - Configured for threefold.info/economics deployment - Added ops documentation for server deployment - Updated baseUrl and URL configuration
13 KiB
sidebar_position
sidebar_position |
---|
3 |
Pricing Model & Income Analysis
Understanding the economics of farming is essential for making informed hardware decisions. This page breaks down pricing, utilization scenarios, and ROI calculations.
Pricing Components
Per-Slice Pricing Structure
Each slice has two key price points:
Minimum Price (Floor):
- Conservative market pricing
- Ensures farmers can cover costs
- Competitive with major cloud providers at bulk rates
- Assumes moderate demand
Maximum Price (Ceiling):
- Premium positioning
- Comparable to retail cloud pricing
- Assumes high demand and full utilization
- Competitive advantage scenarios
Example: Standard Compute Slice
- Min: 1.2 CC/month (~$0.15)
- Max: 12.0 CC/month (~$1.54)
- Range: 10x spread between floor and ceiling
Revenue Share Breakdown
Every Cloud Credit (CC) spent on TFGrid capacity is distributed as follows:
pie title Revenue Distribution per 100 CC
"Farmer (You!)" : 80
"TFT Burn (Deflationary)" : 10
"ThreeFold Operations" : 10
What This Means
If a user pays 100 CC for your slices:
Recipient | Amount | Purpose |
---|---|---|
Farmer | 80 CC | Your income |
TFT Burn | 10 CC | Reduces TFT supply → supports token value |
ThreeFold | 10 CC | Platform development, operations, support |
:::tip Farmer-First Model With 80% going directly to farmers, you keep the vast majority of value generated by your infrastructure. :::
Income Scenarios by Node Type
Scenario Analysis Framework
We analyze three utilization scenarios for each node:
- Conservative (20-30% utilization): Network still growing
- Moderate (50-60% utilization): Healthy network adoption
- Optimistic (80-100% utilization): High demand period
Example: Mini 3 (Certified Node)
Hardware Investment: $1,000 Monthly HW Cost: 17 CC Maximum Slices: 25 Typical Active Slices: 25 (can provide full 25)
Conservative Scenario (30% utilization, min pricing)
Active Slices: 25 × 30% = 7.5 slices
Price per Slice: 1.5 CC (minimum)
Gross Income: 7.5 × 1.5 = 11.25 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 9 CC/month
Net Profit: 9 - 17 = -8 CC/month (not profitable yet)
Status: Needs higher utilization or pricing to be profitable
Moderate Scenario (60% utilization, mid pricing)
Active Slices: 25 × 60% = 15 slices
Price per Slice: 7.5 CC (midpoint)
Gross Income: 15 × 7.5 = 112.5 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 90 CC/month
Net Profit: 90 - 17 = 73 CC/month
Annual Profit: 73 × 12 = 876 CC (~$112/year)
ROI: $1,000 investment / $112/year = 8.9 years
Status: Profitable but slow ROI
Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
Active Slices: 25 × 100% = 25 slices
Price per Slice: 14.9 CC (maximum)
Gross Income: 25 × 14.9 = 372.5 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 298 CC/month
Net Profit: 298 - 17 = 281 CC/month
Annual Profit: 281 × 12 = 3,372 CC (~$432/year)
ROI: $1,000 investment / $432/year = 2.3 years
Status: Excellent ROI with strong demand
Example: Large TFGrid Node
Hardware Investment: $2,000 Monthly HW Cost: 33 CC Maximum Slices: 100 Typical Active Slices: 20 (limited by resource balance)
Conservative Scenario (25% utilization, min pricing)
Active Slices: 20 × 25% = 5 slices
Price per Slice: 7.6 CC (minimum)
Gross Income: 5 × 7.6 = 38 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 30.4 CC/month
Net Profit: 30.4 - 33 = -2.6 CC/month (slight loss)
Status: Nearly break-even at low utilization
Moderate Scenario (50% utilization, mid pricing)
Active Slices: 20 × 50% = 10 slices
Price per Slice: 40 CC (midpoint)
Gross Income: 10 × 40 = 400 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 320 CC/month
Net Profit: 320 - 33 = 287 CC/month
Annual Profit: 287 × 12 = 3,444 CC (~$441/year)
ROI: $2,000 investment / $441/year = 4.5 years
Status: Solid profitability
Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
Active Slices: 20 × 100% = 20 slices
Price per Slice: 76.2 CC (maximum)
Gross Income: 20 × 76.2 = 1,524 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 1,219 CC/month
Net Profit: 1,219 - 33 = 1,186 CC/month
Annual Profit: 1,186 × 12 = 14,232 CC (~$1,822/year)
ROI: $2,000 investment / $1,822/year = 1.1 years
Status: Outstanding ROI
:::tip High-Memory Advantage Large TFGrid Node's 512 GB RAM enables premium memory-heavy slice pricing, driving higher income per active slice. :::
Example: Nvidia 6000 (Dual GPU)
Hardware Investment: $30,000 Monthly HW Cost: 500 CC Maximum Slices: 2 (dedicated GPU slices) Typical Active Slices: 2
Conservative Scenario (50% utilization, min pricing)
Active Slices: 2 × 50% = 1 slice
Price per Slice: 300 CC (minimum)
Gross Income: 1 × 300 = 300 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 240 CC/month
Net Profit: 240 - 500 = -260 CC/month (loss)
Status: Needs higher utilization for profitability
Moderate Scenario (75% utilization, mid pricing)
Active Slices: 2 × 75% = 1.5 slices
Price per Slice: 1,650 CC (midpoint)
Gross Income: 1.5 × 1,650 = 2,475 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 1,980 CC/month
Net Profit: 1,980 - 500 = 1,480 CC/month
Annual Profit: 1,480 × 12 = 17,760 CC (~$2,273/year)
ROI: $30,000 investment / $2,273/year = 13.2 years
Status: Profitable but requires patience
Optimistic Scenario (100% utilization, premium pricing)
Active Slices: 2 × 100% = 2 slices
Price per Slice: 3,000 CC (maximum)
Gross Income: 2 × 3,000 = 6,000 CC/month
Your Share (80%): 4,800 CC/month
Net Profit: 4,800 - 500 = 4,300 CC/month
Annual Profit: 4,300 × 12 = 51,600 CC (~$6,605/year)
ROI: $30,000 investment / $6,605/year = 4.5 years
Status: Excellent returns with AI demand
:::note AI Premium Pricing GPU nodes can command significantly higher prices due to AI/ML demand. Market pricing for comparable GPU cloud instances supports these ranges. :::
Income Comparison: All Nodes at 50% Utilization
Assuming 50% utilization and mid-point pricing:
Node Type | HW Cost | Monthly Net | Annual Net | ROI (Years) | Annual % Return |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3Node Home | $500 | ~35 CC | ~420 CC | ~10 | ~10% |
Large TFGrid | $2,000 | ~287 CC | ~3,444 CC | ~4.5 | ~22% |
Large TFGrid 2 | $1,200 | ~100 CC | ~1,200 CC | ~8 | ~12.5% |
Mini 1 | $350 | ~30 CC | ~360 CC | ~8 | ~12.5% |
Mini 2 | $800 | ~60 CC | ~720 CC | ~9 | ~11% |
Mini 3 | $1,000 | ~73 CC | ~876 CC | ~9 | ~11% |
Mini AI 1 | $2,000 | ~140 CC | ~1,680 CC | ~9.5 | ~10.5% |
Nvidia 6000 1x | $15,000 | ~875 CC | ~10,500 CC | ~11.4 | ~8.8% |
Nvidia 6000 2x | $30,000 | ~1,480 CC | ~17,760 CC | ~13.5 | ~7.4% |
Tenstorrent 8x | $30,000 | ~1,480 CC | ~17,760 CC | ~13.5 | ~7.4% |
CC values converted to USD at $0.128/CC for ROI calculations
Key Factors Affecting Income
1. Network Utilization
What drives it:
- Total TFGrid capacity available
- Number of active users/applications
- Seasonal demand fluctuations
- Marketing and ecosystem growth
Your influence:
- Limited direct control
- Participate in community promotion
- Ensure node uptime and reliability
2. Pricing Strategy
Competitive considerations:
- AWS, GCP, Azure pricing benchmarks
- Other TFGrid farmers' pricing
- Your node's specifications (certified vs. non-certified)
- Geographic location / latency advantages
Your influence:
- Set competitive pricing when marketplace allows
- Offer discounts for long-term commitments
- Premium pricing for certified or high-spec nodes
3. Node Uptime & Reliability
Impact:
- Downtime = no income during that period
- Poor reliability = lost customers
- Consistent uptime = reputation and repeat business
Your influence:
- Invest in quality hardware
- Ensure stable internet connection
- Monitor and maintain proactively
- Use UPS/backup power if possible
4. Resource Balance
What matters:
- Nodes limited by weakest resource (CPU, RAM, or storage)
- Well-balanced nodes can sell more slices
- Bottlenecks reduce effective slice count
Your influence:
- Choose balanced hardware configurations
- Consider upgrading bottlenecks (e.g., add RAM)
- Understand which resource constrains your node
ROI Sensitivities
Utilization Impact
For a Mini 3 node ($1,000 investment):
Utilization | Monthly Net Profit | Annual Profit | ROI Years |
---|---|---|---|
20% | -8 CC | -96 CC | Never (loss) |
30% | 9 CC | 108 CC | 74 years |
40% | 45 CC | 540 CC | 14.8 years |
50% | 73 CC | 876 CC | 9.1 years |
60% | 109 CC | 1,308 CC | 6.1 years |
80% | 181 CC | 2,172 CC | 3.7 years |
100% | 253 CC | 3,036 CC | 2.6 years |
Assumes mid-point pricing at all utilization levels
Pricing Impact
For a Large TFGrid Node ($2,000 investment) at 50% utilization:
Price Point | Monthly Net Profit | Annual Profit | ROI Years |
---|---|---|---|
Minimum | 99 CC | 1,188 CC | 13.4 years |
25th percentile | 420 CC | 5,040 CC | 3.2 years |
Midpoint | 287 CC | 3,444 CC | 4.6 years |
75th percentile | 756 CC | 9,072 CC | 1.8 years |
Maximum | 1,186 CC | 14,232 CC | 1.1 years |
Comparative Cloud Pricing
To validate our pricing model, here's how TFGrid compares to major cloud providers:
Standard Compute Instance
TFGrid Standard Slice:
- 2 cores, 4 GB RAM, ~140 GB SSD
- Price: 1.2 - 12.0 CC/month ($0.15 - $1.54/month)
- Hourly: $0.005 - $0.05/hour
AWS t3.medium:
- 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM
- Price:
$30/month ($0.042/hour)
GCP e2-medium:
- 2 vCPUs, 4 GB RAM
- Price:
$24/month ($0.033/hour)
TFGrid Advantage: 50-95% cheaper than major clouds at similar specs
AI/GPU Instance
TFGrid AI Slice (Nvidia 6000):
- 24 cores, 124 GB RAM, 96 GB GPU
- Price: 300 - 3,000 CC/month ($38 - $384/month)
- Hourly: $0.053 - $0.53/hour
AWS p3.2xlarge (V100 16GB):
- 8 vCPUs, 61 GB RAM, 16 GB GPU
- Price:
$3.06/hour ($2,200/month for full-time)
GCP a2-highgpu-1g (A100 40GB):
- 12 vCPUs, 85 GB RAM, 40 GB GPU
- Price:
$3.67/hour ($2,640/month for full-time)
TFGrid Advantage: 80-95% cheaper with larger GPU memory (96 GB vs 16-40 GB)
:::tip Competitive Positioning Even at maximum pricing, TFGrid undercuts major cloud providers significantly. At minimum pricing, it's dramatically cheaper while providing more resources. :::
Risk Factors & Considerations
Market Risks
- Network adoption rate: Slower than expected growth delays profitability
- Competition: Other decentralized cloud platforms
- Pricing pressure: Race to the bottom if oversupply occurs
- Technology shifts: New hardware makes existing nodes obsolete faster
Operational Risks
- Electricity costs: Not included in hardware cost calculations
- Internet costs: Bandwidth charges in some regions
- Maintenance: Hardware failures, replacements
- Obsolescence: 5-year amortization assumes hardware remains competitive
Mitigation Strategies
- Start small: Test with lower-cost nodes before scaling
- Diversify: Mix node types (standard + AI)
- Stay informed: Active participation in community
- Plan for upgrades: Budget for hardware refresh cycles
Total Capacity & Market Size
Based on ThreeFold's current bid commitments (see TF Bid Packages):
Total Potential Market:
- ~24,150 slices across all bid types
- ~$253,800/month at minimum pricing
- ~$3,965,625/month at maximum pricing
- ~$507 million annual market at maximum pricing
This represents committed ThreeFold demand, not total market potential. Additional demand will come from:
- End-user applications
- Enterprise offtakers
- Individual developers and projects
- Partner ecosystems
Next Steps
For Potential Farmers
- Review Node Specifications - Choose hardware based on budget
- Run your own calculations - Use your local electricity/internet costs
- Start conservative - Plan for 30-40% utilization initially
- Monitor and adjust - Track real performance and optimize
For Current Farmers
- Evaluate upgrade paths - Consider certified nodes Q4 2025
- Optimize pricing - Balance competitiveness with profitability
- Improve uptime - Maximize income from existing hardware
- Plan for AI - GPU nodes represent significant growth opportunity
:::info Living Document As the network matures and real utilization data becomes available, these projections will be refined. Join the community to stay updated on actual farmer income reports. :::
:::tip Questions? Discuss pricing strategies and share experiences in the ThreeFold Forum and Telegram community. :::