tokens

collections/projectinca/plan/advisors.md

@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+## Advisors
+

collections/projectinca/plan/collaboration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,88 @@
+![alt text](p2ppromotion.png)
+
+# Collaboration
+
+We had the pleasure collaborating on the creation and succesful development for more than 10 high tech startups.
+
+We realized that the way how we collaborate defines a big part of the outcome. 
+
+> A lot of this knowledge can be found on [https://threefold.info/cocreation](https://threefold.info/cocreation)/
+
+Working together with the OurWorld / ThreeFold ecosystem means you agree and are committed to above as such its highly appreciated you take some time to go over the info.
+
+## Summary lets choose the best of the 2 ways
+
+There are 2 ways how to collaborate:
+
+1. The typical pyramid system, where a boss manages (directs) a sub boss until the required results are achieved and any non compliance results in “fixing” the issue. This results in harsh cultures and not even that effective. 
+2. A circular system with clear stakeholders, examples are scrum, … These are more agile methods and leave a lot of freedom but require a certain discipline. To let 2 work agreement on how to interface (tools, process reports, …) needs to be agreed upon between ALL stakeholders because it's more dynamic and more interconnected compared to 1.
+
+Obviously we are not a believer of 1, this means certain discipline and agreement to following existing tooling is a must. 
+
+2 is a commitment though, often we see people wanting to combine the benefits of 1 into 2, that often doesn’t work e.g. “TRUST me, I know what I am doing, let me alone…” these are statements which can work in 1 not in 2.
+
+ In 2 we trust each other by design but we require transparency and ability to comment on the work we are doing.
+
+
+## Tools
+
+TF has adopted a set of tools to work following “2”, these tools are maybe not something you are used to or comfortable with. But don’t panic, millions of people have been able to do this before you,  \
+so I guess you can do the same (the system we use is the same as github but actually easier).
+
+### Our tools
+
+* We use Gitea for
+    * Task management
+    * Story Management
+    * Websites
+    * Specs, Code, … 
+    * E-Books, Wiki’s, Manuals
+    * There is continuous integration & deployment.
+    * Gitea is the basis for our own future vision of how to collaborate deploy on TFGrid see [https://threefold.info/tech/tech/roadmap.html](https://threefold.info/tech/tech/roadmap.html)
+* We use GDrive for all our other documents
+    * All Info is in a GDrive folder dedicated for Project INCA
+* We use Telegram for internal communication
+    * Also groups, you can have topics just like we do in Slack.
+    * I am sorry but I don’t want our team to lose time by using yet another tool
+
+### Not enough reporting
+
+A common complaint is that gitea doesn’t give enough reporting, there is a plan to fix this
+
+* A portal is being created to make it easy for all of us to collaborate, will be done in Summer
+    * Company/Project Directory  \
+(what are all projects our larger community is working on)
+    * People Directory
+    * Nice overview of Stories/Tasks/Milestones/… will get info from Gitea
+    * Priority management: will warn user when we are getting behind on tasks, stories
+    * Reward dashboard (tokens, shares, reward pool, …)
+    * Information overview (what is most relevant info per project)
+    * Contract overview (with security of course), includes our SAFE’s
+* Phase 2:
+    * Internal chat/messaging  \
+(might replace telegram for internal communication at one point in time)
+    * Integrated sort of forum for discussions
+    * Video Conferencing
+
+
+## We work in an agile way
+
+As such we want everyone to understand and endorse that we are not a pyramid and are ok to work in a more Teal Based organization structure:
+
+* No-one is the boss of a pyramid, we don’t do politics.
+* Instead we have coordinators and they make sure that stories, milestones are understood, these are on gitea, they make sure there are stakeholders and stakeholders do agree on the stories & milestones. (do note stories are high level and have nicely described deliverables and requirements).
+* All information worked at all times is transparent, and on the right location, no-one keeps it on their own drive not even to prepare, people are disciplined to make sure files no longer relevant go to _archive folder.
+* We avoid too many meetings, we make stories, we make specs, we review specs, we use git… to get to consensus and then the occasional stakeholder meeting is used to find consensus. We log (comments) on the stories. We make everything accountable.
+* We accept our wiki as a single source of truth even if it means learning how to use it, we will not ad hoc put all kinds of documents everywhere which of course cannot be followed by the team and will need endless meetings.
+* We are aware of victimhood and try not to be there, we take responsibility for our own actions first, if the story is not clear and we accepted it it's our own fault, if we didn’t escalate to the right stakeholders it's our own fault, if we didn’t report our progress properly it's our own fault people don’t know,... 
+* We avoid as much as we can centralized tools, only when there is really no alternative (yet) we use them e.g. GDrive and the stakeholders do agree. No-one has the power to choose another tool unless OurWorld, Project INCA & TF together agree. This is super important to make sure that we can create this portal and work together efficiently.
+* Whoever cannot work this way is not welcome to be an active contributor to the Project INCA Team. The coordinators make sure this section is enforced.
+
+
+## We do believe
+
+* Our Team Members are passionate and truly Believe TF has something to offer.
+* Our Team Members DO not do it to make a quick win (tokens),  \
+Our Team Members  do it in the first place because they want TF to succeed.
+* Our Team Members  are capable of collaborating and being inclusive and respectful.
+* Our Team Members  do understand we are different and want to be different

collections/projectinca/plan/governance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+## INCA Governance
+
+A Wisdom Council approves budgets in line to tokenomics above.
+
+The ThreeFold Wisdom Council will have 9 members in total. For any decision taken by the council, at least 6 must agree to go forward.
+
+### Council Members
+
+We start with 7 members and 2 more members will need to be added later on.
+
+- 1 OurWorld (Kristof)
+- 1 ThreeFold DMCC (Adnan)
+- 1 TF9 (Jan)
+- 1 Sikana (Greg)
+- 1 CodeScalers (Nayer)
+- 1 ThreeFold COOP (Sabrina)
+  - The COOP project is still ongoing and will still be created.
+- 1 GreenEdge (MWW)
+
+### Budget Allocation
+
+- Budgets get allocated to projects on git.threefold.info
+- Clear stories with clear budget allocations and cashflow tracking or time tracking

collections/projectinca/plan/ideas.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+
+
+# Ideas
+
+
+## INCA G
+
+
+* Replacement strategy of staking is 
+    * People need INCA in their wallets to get discounts.
+    * Certain amount of INCA is needed to be held per Node if they want to guarantee their SLA’s , if they can’t achieve their SAL then these tokens are used to compensate market
+* An INCA G (Generator) token can be created 
+    * INCA G is a generator token of future capacity, name can change
+    * This token can be sold with no limits even on Solana as long as people are whitelisted
+    * INCA G will be structured as a real Security in our Digital Freezone once we have it.
+    * INCA G can only be sold to people who did KYC/AML  \
+and paid a 24 EUR membership fee to be part of our cooperative in the freezone.
+* We can organize semi public sell of INCA Tokens through free-zone
+* Other ideas ???

collections/projectinca/plan/requirements.md

@@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
+
+# Requirements = “our box we operate in”
+
+Its important we all agree on our requirements and all actions will be in line with these requirements.
+
+## Regulatory
+
+Avoid any possible link to token as security
+
+* There will be no staking of INCA or any other token created.
+* There will be no yield generating instruments created with INCA
+* There will be no public launch of INCA Tokens (private sell ok)
+
+A COOP might be a good structure for resolving our regulatory requirements for farmers  \
+& larger customers.
+
+* It needs to be all super simple and easy for our user base.
+* Every farmer and every user who is spending more than 1000 USD/month  \
+(using any supported digital or fiat currency) \
+is part of a COOP which will be structured in our digital freezone.
+* This will be made super easy (just KYC simple process) and you pay 24 USD to get started.
+* COOP Membership fee is :
+    * 1 USD per month for basic users (to be paid at setup) for INCA G holders
+    * 10 USD per month for members who need more features
+
+
+## Reputation
+
+One of our biggest strengths is how we link back to the real world through our government connections and soon a major telco. While this is great this also means we need to stay very clean in relation to reputation and how we come across.
+
+## Positioning
+
+* We don’t try to be like the other casino projects or even mimic what they do.
+* We are ourselves a decent project, with an aim to become the biggest Edge Cloud Provider in the world which is a viable alternative to the centralized players.
+* We focus on expansion because that is needed first.
+
+## Marketing Wise
+
+* We will not brand ourselves or even be understood as a pump & dump,  \
+We stay loyal to our values at all times.
+* We are different and will position ourselves as being different.
+
+
+## Funding & Tokenomics
+
+Let's together agree on the following:
+
+
+
+* There is focus on finding funding, the people who do fundraise do understand how it works e.g. first get to the term sheet before giving certain info, get lots of info open for negotiation and advice, know that most questions asked are asked for other reasons, … 
+* <span style="text-decoration:underline;">If there is vesting then Vesting for TFT holders will be the same for ALL TFT holders.</span>
+* We are perfectly ok to show an overview of who has which tokens but some work needs to be done, some original token holders agree to grant tokens to a pool, some of the details are on our INCA wiki.
+* TFT x1 or TFT x2 can be part of negotiation once enough money has been found, e.g. if 30m EUR comes then I am sure we can convince our community to keep it on 1x  \
+(1x = means 1 Billion of the 4 Billion)
+* We will not sell INCA tokens underneath 0.05 USD per INCA,  \
+this needs to be the absolute lowest level (and anyhow no public sell).
+
+
+## Transparency 
+
+
+* There is a weekly report sent to community, TF, Ourworld around what has been achieved
+* There are regular meetings with community
+* There are regular stakeholder meetings (at least 1x per week at start)
+* All our docs are as much as possible opensource, on gitea (doc…), if not possible gdrive but always in the same gdrive under the same root folder and open as much as possible.
+
+
+# Remark: we are ok with
+
+* Using exchanges, market makers, …
+* Meeting the market where it's at.
+* Use influencers.
+* Play the game (as long as we don’t lose our values)
+* Use whatever tools which are needed to reach communities (they can be centralized ofcourse)
+

collections/projectinca/plan/tf_colab.md

@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+
+# Threefold is involved
+
+
+## Involvement of TF9
+
+We communicate between the circles using our tooling…
+
+* Listen to requirements and keep on developing the tech.
+* Support the TFGrid, keep it up and running
+* Create TF Grid 4
+
+## Involvement of ThreeFold Dubai
+
+We communicate between the circles using our tooling…
+
+* Find nice projects who want to build on top of us e.g. Holochain, DFinity, … 
+* Manage the grant pools.
+* Manage the validators for TFGrid, means help the people who host them, it's decentralized
+* Manage the tokens and guardians (protectors of smart contracts, bridges).
+* Help maintain the wiki’s, websites, …
+* Help in fundraise
+
+
+> TODO: complete
+
+

collections/projectinca/plan/theplan_a.md

@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+![alt text](theplan.png)
+
+# DePIN Launch Plan A
+
+ThreeFold is expanding to the DePIN market.
+
+- INCA is the token for the TFGrid 4.x
+  - It's our commercialization token
+  - It will be used on the INCA marketplace
+
+
+## info
+
+- [INCA Token](inca1.md)
+- [Governance](governance.md)
+

collections/projectinca/plan/theplan_b.md

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 ![alt text](theplan.png)
 
-# DePIN Launch
+# DePIN Launch Plan B
+
+> In case not enough funding was found.
 
 ThreeFold is expanding to the DePIN market.