42 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
|
|
||
|
|
## status
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> status, factfinding over summer
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### results
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- good success rate
|
||
|
|
- some serious potential partnerships
|
||
|
|
- the serious investors not interesting in hype & pump/dump
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### what works best
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- the tech, we survived some good DD's, some went very deep, everyone who looks deeper agrees there us no-one close
|
||
|
|
- the traction we have with telco, governments, some big partners, ...
|
||
|
|
- structure of tech company vs opensource depin, very good
|
||
|
|
- link to freezone is important for some
|
||
|
|
- the experience online is good enough, manuals good enough
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### what are we still working on, but almost done
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- new version of website: https://dev.threefold.io/
|
||
|
|
- super simple verison of manual we are learning from https://docs.aethir.com/
|
||
|
|
- tokenomics getting very close, cannot sign off on it yet, also want to have lead investor
|
||
|
|
- easier manual for quantum safe storage
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### what is done
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- roadmap
|
||
|
|
- multi blockchain, governance, decentralization, ...
|
||
|
|
- liquidity pool (innovative)
|
||
|
|
- generator tokens = INCAG - also good for vesting
|
||
|
|
- will do token offering for deploying nodes (INCAG)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### what works against us
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- history of token, the low price and long duration of low price is not good
|
||
|
|
- we don't communicate well
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|