## Geo Awareness is the Solution for many of the Internet Problems
The problems:
- [Compare Electricity](../internet_today/compare_electricity.md) - Compares the inefficiency of relying on distant internet infrastructure to the absurdity of using electricity generated on the other side of the world.
- [Internet Basics](../internet_today/internet_basics.md) - Explains the three fundamental layers of the internet: compute/AI/storage, network, and applications, highlighting current centralization issues.
- [Centralization Risk](../internet_today/centralization_risk.md) - Details the dangers of relying on centralized infrastructure and services, using real-world examples like the Ukraine conflict.
- [The Race For Intelligence](../internet_today/ai.md) - Discusses how AI agents will replace traditional apps within 2 years and the implications of centralized AI development.
- [GDP Negative Impact](../internet_today/gdp_negative.md) - Reveals how the current internet structure causes economic losses for developing nations, with case studies showing billions in yearly losses.
- [Internet Protocol Is Broken](../internet_today/internet_risk.md) - Explains why TCP/IP's outdated design is inadequate for modern internet needs and explores RINA as a potential solution.
- [Painkillers Approach](../internet_today/onion_analogy.md) - Uses an onion analogy to illustrate how adding layers to internet infrastructure masks symptoms rather than solving core problems.
**The following table shows how the problems as listed above are fixed because of geo awareness.**
| **Centralization** | Dominated by a few corporations; creates fragility and dependency. | Often more Decentralized, but lacks local autonomy; often relies on centralized validators and still datacenters. | Fully decentralized and location-specific, empowering local infrastructure and sovereignty. |
| **Data Sovereignty** | Data stored in centralized data centers controlled by corporations. | Decentralized storage, but users often lack control over physical location. | Users choose specific locations for data storage, ensuring sovereignty and privacy. |
| **Infrastructure Resilience** | Vulnerable to disasters, geopolitical issues, and single points of failure. | Often less resilient compared to Web2 (^1) | Shortest physical paths and local redundancies ensure continued operation during disruptions. New paths are found when needed even by using nodes from your friends |
| **Economic Impact (GDP Negative)** | High costs for infrastructure; revenue flows to global platforms. | The validators are still too centralized and often hosted in centralized datanceters. Too complicated and too early days to help right now. | Localized infrastructure boosts regional economies, keeping revenue within countries. |
| **Internet Efficiency** | Long data routes; underutilized hardware; inefficient layers. | Reliant on outdated protocols, vulnerable because of used ledger tech (^1) and layered inefficiencies. | Shortest paths reduce latency and cost; full hardware optimization ensures efficiency. |
| **Security and Transparency** | Complex, security by smart employees of the corporations. | Smart contracts improve security, but issues remain as code upgrade path. | Transparent and tamper-proof deployments ensure security and resilience. |
| **Layer Complexity** | Redundant layers create inefficiencies and fragility. | Often web3 is more complex compared to web 2. | Simplifies architecture by localizing compute, storage, and networking. 10x less development effort is possible |
| **Application Hosting** | Hosted in large centralized data centers, increasing latency and cost. | Sometimes, decentralized hosting but not geographically optimized. | Applications can be hosted locally, reducing latency and ensuring autonomy. |
| **Access Inequality** | Over 50% of the world lacks reliable access. | Expands access but without addressing local infrastructure challenges. | Geo-aware systems build localized, affordable infrastructure to improve access. |
| **Session Management** | Breaks under interruptions; no native continuity. | Some continuity improvements via decentralized protocols. | Built-in session management ensures reliability even during disruptions. |
### Challenges in the Current Depin (Decentralized Internet) World
Despite advancements in decentralized technology, geo-awareness remains under-prioritized.
Current Web3 solutions focus on decentralization without accounting for the geographic efficiency or sovereignty that geo-awareness offers.
---
### Comparison Table: Current Web3 Solutions vs. Geo-Aware Systems
| **Storage** | Global, often randomly distributed without user control | Users choose storage locations; data remains sovereign |
| **Compute** | Decentralized but lacks location-specific optimization | Compute occurs at chosen locations; optimized for region |
| **Network** | Relies on global, non-optimized routing | Shortest physical path for communication |
| **Ledger** | Public blockchains are unreliable in case of network issues | Location-aware sovereign ledgers for national and local control |
| **Resilience** | Vulnerable to global internet disruptions | Independent operation during outages |
| **Application Control** | Limited transparency on app deployment locations and upgrade paths. | Full control and visibility of app deployment |
| **Data Integrity** | Prone to distributed risks and complexities | Tamper-proof, user-controlled data access |
---
### Why Geo-Awareness Matters
The current centralized and globalized digital architecture exacerbates inefficiencies, compromises sovereignty, and creates economic dependencies. Geo-awareness addresses these problems by creating a decentralized yet location-sensitive framework. This ensures that infrastructure is resilient, secure, and operates in harmony with the physical realities of the world, ultimately empowering users and nations alike.
