refactor
This commit is contained in:
7
docs/main/geoaware/_category_.json
Normal file
7
docs/main/geoaware/_category_.json
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "The Solution \"Geo Aware\"",
|
||||
"position": 3,
|
||||
"link": {
|
||||
"type": "generated-index"
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
32
docs/main/geoaware/geo_aware.md
Normal file
32
docs/main/geoaware/geo_aware.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
sidebar_position: 1
|
||||
title: 'What is Geo Awareness'
|
||||
hide_title: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## What is Geo Awareness
|
||||
|
||||
**Geo-awareness** ensures that digital systems operate with respect to geographic and physical realities. This concept radically shifts how we approach storage, computation, and networking by enabling location-centric control and efficiency. Here's what it entails:
|
||||
|
||||
#### Key Features of Geo-Awareness:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Shortest Physical Path for Communication**
|
||||
Communication between two parties happens through the shortest physical route, reducing latency and energy consumption while increasing efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Data Sovereignty and Integrity**
|
||||
Users can decide where their data is stored. The data remains incorruptible and accessible only to the user or their personal AI agent, ensuring data privacy and sovereignty.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Resilient Internet Functionality**
|
||||
Even in cases of internet outages or disasters, most apps and services remain operational, ensuring reliability and continuity.
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Control Over Applications and AI**
|
||||
Geo-awareness enables users to decide where their applications and personal AI agents operate, giving them full control over their digital footprint and reducing external vulnerabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
5. **Transparent Deployment of Code**
|
||||
Knowing exactly which code or app is deployed where ensures security and prevents tampering.
|
||||
|
||||
6. **Relevance for Nations and Public Infrastructure**
|
||||
Unlike public blockchains that lack geo-awareness, this model empowers countries with localized control, enhancing sovereignty and trust.
|
||||
|
||||
BIN
docs/main/geoaware/img/geo_aware.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/main/geoaware/img/geo_aware.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 792 KiB |
BIN
docs/main/geoaware/img/geo_aware2.png
Normal file
BIN
docs/main/geoaware/img/geo_aware2.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 884 KiB |
66
docs/main/geoaware/solution.md
Normal file
66
docs/main/geoaware/solution.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
sidebar_position: 4
|
||||
title: 'Solution For a Better Internet'
|
||||
hide_title: true
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Geo Awareness is the Solution for many of the Internet Problems
|
||||
|
||||
The problems:
|
||||
|
||||
- [Compare Electricity](../internet_today/compare_electricity.md) - Compares the inefficiency of relying on distant internet infrastructure to the absurdity of using electricity generated on the other side of the world.
|
||||
- [Internet Basics](../internet_today/internet_basics.md) - Explains the three fundamental layers of the internet: compute/AI/storage, network, and applications, highlighting current centralization issues.
|
||||
- [Centralization Risk](../internet_today/centralization_risk.md) - Details the dangers of relying on centralized infrastructure and services, using real-world examples like the Ukraine conflict.
|
||||
- [The Race For Intelligence](../internet_today/ai.md) - Discusses how AI agents will replace traditional apps within 2 years and the implications of centralized AI development.
|
||||
- [GDP Negative Impact](../internet_today/gdp_negative.md) - Reveals how the current internet structure causes economic losses for developing nations, with case studies showing billions in yearly losses.
|
||||
- [Internet Protocol Is Broken](../internet_today/internet_risk.md) - Explains why TCP/IP's outdated design is inadequate for modern internet needs and explores RINA as a potential solution.
|
||||
- [Painkillers Approach](../internet_today/onion_analogy.md) - Uses an onion analogy to illustrate how adding layers to internet infrastructure masks symptoms rather than solving core problems.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
**The following table shows how the problems as listed above are fixed because of geo awareness.**
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| **Problem Area** | **Web2** | **Web3** | **Web 0 = Geo-Aware** |
|
||||
| ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Centralization** | Dominated by a few corporations; creates fragility and dependency. | Often more Decentralized, but lacks local autonomy; often relies on centralized validators and still datacenters. | Fully decentralized and location-specific, empowering local infrastructure and sovereignty. |
|
||||
| **Data Sovereignty** | Data stored in centralized data centers controlled by corporations. | Decentralized storage, but users often lack control over physical location. | Users choose specific locations for data storage, ensuring sovereignty and privacy. |
|
||||
| **Infrastructure Resilience** | Vulnerable to disasters, geopolitical issues, and single points of failure. | Often less resilient compared to Web2 (^1) | Shortest physical paths and local redundancies ensure continued operation during disruptions. New paths are found when needed even by using nodes from your friends |
|
||||
| **Economic Impact (GDP Negative)** | High costs for infrastructure; revenue flows to global platforms. | The validators are still too centralized and often hosted in centralized datanceters. Too complicated and too early days to help right now. | Localized infrastructure boosts regional economies, keeping revenue within countries. |
|
||||
| **Internet Efficiency** | Long data routes; underutilized hardware; inefficient layers. | Reliant on outdated protocols, vulnerable because of used ledger tech (^1) and layered inefficiencies. | Shortest paths reduce latency and cost; full hardware optimization ensures efficiency. |
|
||||
| **Security and Transparency** | Complex, security by smart employees of the corporations. | Smart contracts improve security, but issues remain as code upgrade path. | Transparent and tamper-proof deployments ensure security and resilience. |
|
||||
| **Layer Complexity** | Redundant layers create inefficiencies and fragility. | Often web3 is more complex compared to web 2. | Simplifies architecture by localizing compute, storage, and networking. 10x less development effort is possible |
|
||||
| **Application Hosting** | Hosted in large centralized data centers, increasing latency and cost. | Sometimes, decentralized hosting but not geographically optimized. | Applications can be hosted locally, reducing latency and ensuring autonomy. |
|
||||
| **Access Inequality** | Over 50% of the world lacks reliable access. | Expands access but without addressing local infrastructure challenges. | Geo-aware systems build localized, affordable infrastructure to improve access. |
|
||||
| **Session Management** | Breaks under interruptions; no native continuity. | Some continuity improvements via decentralized protocols. | Built-in session management ensures reliability even during disruptions. |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenges in the Current Depin (Decentralized Internet) World
|
||||
|
||||
Despite advancements in decentralized technology, geo-awareness remains under-prioritized.
|
||||
|
||||
Current Web3 solutions focus on decentralization without accounting for the geographic efficiency or sovereignty that geo-awareness offers.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Comparison Table: Current Web3 Solutions vs. Geo-Aware Systems
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
| **Feature** | **Current Web3 Solutions** | **Geo-Awareness** |
|
||||
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Storage** | Global, often randomly distributed without user control | Users choose storage locations; data remains sovereign |
|
||||
| **Compute** | Decentralized but lacks location-specific optimization | Compute occurs at chosen locations; optimized for region |
|
||||
| **Network** | Relies on global, non-optimized routing | Shortest physical path for communication |
|
||||
| **Ledger** | Public blockchains are unreliable in case of network issues | Location-aware sovereign ledgers for national and local control |
|
||||
| **Resilience** | Vulnerable to global internet disruptions | Independent operation during outages |
|
||||
| **Application Control** | Limited transparency on app deployment locations and upgrade paths. | Full control and visibility of app deployment |
|
||||
| **Data Integrity** | Prone to distributed risks and complexities | Tamper-proof, user-controlled data access |
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Geo-Awareness Matters
|
||||
|
||||
The current centralized and globalized digital architecture exacerbates inefficiencies, compromises sovereignty, and creates economic dependencies. Geo-awareness addresses these problems by creating a decentralized yet location-sensitive framework. This ensures that infrastructure is resilient, secure, and operates in harmony with the physical realities of the world, ultimately empowering users and nations alike.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user