Comparison of ThreeFold to Akash & Nosana #182

Closed
opened 2024-06-12 07:56:57 +00:00 by gosam · 7 comments
Owner

This is being requested by INCA team for an investor deck. Something like the attached screenshot.

@Amanda Could you start on something today and @mik-tf / @scott can pick it up?

Is there a project we would recommend looking at instead of Nosana?

This is a relatively urgent ask.

This is being requested by INCA team for an investor deck. Something like the attached screenshot. @Amanda Could you start on something today and @mik-tf / @scott can pick it up? Is there a project we would recommend looking at instead of Nosana? This is a relatively urgent ask.
mik-tf was assigned by gosam 2024-06-12 07:56:58 +00:00
Amanda was assigned by gosam 2024-06-12 07:56:58 +00:00
gosam added this to the June 10 – June 23 project 2024-06-12 07:56:58 +00:00
Member

Sure @gosam.

Sure @gosam.
Member

@mik-tf @scott I have started on things we could compare with if you think we need to add something please do.

@mik-tf @scott I have started on [things we could compare](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IMlZCnnLXsflCRlXhZvyszDOrNrCFVsiRP3mJPQijLk/edit?gid=0#gid=0) with if you think we need to add something please do.
Author
Owner

@mik-tf @scott We need your input here please.

@mik-tf @scott We need your input here please.
Owner

Made some table with info we have. @scott could you double check?

From what I found they all run on bare metal, so I did not include this.

Made some table with info we have. @scott could you double check? From what I found they all run on bare metal, so I did not include this.
Author
Owner

This should work for now.

This should work for now.
gosam closed this issue 2024-06-21 09:04:15 +00:00
Owner

I added some notes and corrections in the sheet.

From what I found they all run on bare metal, so I did not include this.

That's true, but I'm not aware of any other network that prioritizes bare metal like we do. What it means in practice is that these other networks are to greater or lesser extents resellers of capacity from existing clouds.

On the other hand, I heard some discussion at some point around accommodating Zos VMs in a bigger way for v4, so maybe this is not a great point to emphasize.

What we can say though is that our model facilitates the expansion of cloud hardware in a way that the others don't. The other networks essentially require that providers become Linux system admins (and potentially Kubernetes admins on top of that in the case of Akash).

I added some notes and corrections in the sheet. > From what I found they all run on bare metal, so I did not include this. That's true, but I'm not aware of any other network that prioritizes bare metal like we do. What it means in practice is that these other networks are to greater or lesser extents resellers of capacity from existing clouds. On the other hand, I heard some discussion at some point around accommodating Zos VMs in a bigger way for v4, so maybe this is not a great point to emphasize. What we can say though is that our model facilitates the expansion of cloud hardware in a way that the others don't. The other networks essentially require that providers become Linux system admins (and potentially Kubernetes admins on top of that in the case of Akash).
Author
Owner

OK thanks @scott – can you help get the comparison chart fully updated as you see it best (e.g. Add Stack OS, remove Helium, ...). I don't know how we integrate this point about bare metal / how we facilitate the expansion of cloud infra differently than others into a chart, but let us know if you have ideas.

Then I can at least pass the comparison to the INCA team and we can use as well for future content.

OK thanks @scott – can you help get the comparison chart fully updated as you see it best (e.g. Add Stack OS, remove Helium, ...). I don't know how we integrate this point about bare metal / how we facilitate the expansion of cloud infra differently than others into a chart, but let us know if you have ideas. Then I can at least pass the comparison to the INCA team and we can use as well for future content.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No Assignees
4 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: tfgrid/circle_promotion#182
No description provided.