50% of utilization to farmers #93

Closed
opened 2024-08-25 11:12:33 +00:00 by thabeta · 3 comments
Member

https://github.com/threefoldtech/tfchain/issues/996

need to agree on the split for the name contracts

Name contracts are not directly linked to farmer payments. While a name contract is used to deploy gateway workloads (as part of node contracts), the actual payments go to the farmers for the network usage associated with these workloads, not for the name itself.
for the name contract split I suggest you make the foundation 90% and the staking pool 10%

https://github.com/threefoldtech/tfchain/issues/996 need to agree on the split for the name contracts >Name contracts are not directly linked to farmer payments. While a name contract is used to deploy gateway workloads (as part of node contracts), the actual payments go to the farmers for the network usage associated with these workloads, not for the name itself. for the name contract split I suggest you make the foundation 90% and the staking pool 10%
thabeta added the
Story
label 2024-08-25 11:12:43 +00:00
thabeta added this to the tfgrid_3_15 project 2024-08-25 11:12:47 +00:00
thabeta self-assigned this 2024-08-25 11:12:53 +00:00
Owner

stakeholders agree on percentage for naming service

stakeholders agree on percentage for naming service
Author
Member

ready to deploy

ready to deploy
Owner

Can we close? Has this been deployed? Thanks!

Can we close? Has this been deployed? Thanks!
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Milestone
No project
No Assignees
3 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format 'yyyy-mm-dd'.

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: tfgrid/circle_engineering#93
No description provided.