100 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
100 lines
3.4 KiB
Markdown
|
<h1>Engineering Circle Meeting 2024-09-16 </h1>
|
||
|
|
||
|
<h2>Table of Contents</h2>
|
||
|
|
||
|
- [Attendees](#attendees)
|
||
|
- [Main Content](#main-content)
|
||
|
- [TODO - Next Meeting](#todo---next-meeting)
|
||
|
- [TODISCUSS - Next Meeting](#todiscuss---next-meeting)
|
||
|
|
||
|
---
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Attendees
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Lee
|
||
|
- Mik
|
||
|
- Sabrina
|
||
|
- Scott
|
||
|
- Thabet
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Main Content
|
||
|
|
||
|
- GEP Voting Process
|
||
|
- Cool down period
|
||
|
- Consensus
|
||
|
- we don't include it in GEP for now
|
||
|
- we make a GEP for cool down later if we think it's needed.
|
||
|
- Final version of GEP
|
||
|
- consensus
|
||
|
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ovi2ecDI2G75CecLr2tKs7W5a69Ntxo-9F-qaVW7kFI/edit#heading=h.kyru52g80m08
|
||
|
- What is next
|
||
|
- comms circle will publish GEP and let 1 week for the community to ask questions
|
||
|
- Next week (23rd of September), we will sart the GEP on the dashboard and have a 10 days period
|
||
|
- Voting Procedures
|
||
|
- when there's a GEP
|
||
|
- we have a meeting with stakeholders
|
||
|
- we decide the voting, e.g. yes or no
|
||
|
- we make sure the foundation votes for the GEP
|
||
|
- hetnzer work
|
||
|
- going well
|
||
|
- QSFS
|
||
|
- Lee is working on some issues
|
||
|
- Scott will respond to them
|
||
|
- Also working on a pulumi version
|
||
|
- GITEA Access: we fixed the issue of spammers
|
||
|
- https://github.com/threefoldtech/tf_operations/issues/2752
|
||
|
- summary
|
||
|
- now we set registration email verification
|
||
|
- shouldn't have any more spam
|
||
|
- if it's the case
|
||
|
- step 1. set captcha
|
||
|
- step 2. set manual email (verified by admins)
|
||
|
|
||
|
## TODO - Next Meeting
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Ops snapshot node
|
||
|
- TODO: Sabrina will check with Bert post 19 sept.
|
||
|
- Reference: https://github.com/threefoldtech/tfchain/issues/981
|
||
|
- GEP
|
||
|
- start GEP on dashboard 23rd of September, for 10 days period
|
||
|
- git.ourworld.tf ops
|
||
|
- issue to check how to manage the gitea instance, just like we deal with github instance
|
||
|
- Sabrina is taking care of this
|
||
|
|
||
|
## TODISCUSS - Next Meeting
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Things to discuss
|
||
|
- Thursday meeting
|
||
|
- Jimber situation
|
||
|
- discuss with Kristof
|
||
|
- push the 0S4
|
||
|
- how far we are with the network
|
||
|
- make a list of everything which is blocking
|
||
|
- Farmerbot-farmer-minting issue
|
||
|
- scott will present the issue and we can discuss with Thabet, Jan and Kristof on the call: we can't afford to lose farmers, and the error was on TF side, not the farmers.
|
||
|
- for now the proposition is (not ideal for farmers, we risk to lose farmers and nodes)
|
||
|
- make sure it doesn't happen again
|
||
|
- check with the team who implemented the changes
|
||
|
- ZOS team
|
||
|
- can't compensate from treasury
|
||
|
- can't remint
|
||
|
- not fair for non-fbot-farmer compared to fbot-farmer
|
||
|
- Farmers deploying on their own nodes
|
||
|
- for now they can get up to 90% discount
|
||
|
- 50% utilization rewards
|
||
|
- 50% dedicated node
|
||
|
- 60% staking discount
|
||
|
- 0.5 * 0.5 * 0.4 = 0.1
|
||
|
- If TFT price goes up, farmers can rent their full node and still farm TFT
|
||
|
- not sustainable
|
||
|
- starting from 2 cents tft
|
||
|
- farmers can make more money by renting the whole node and still farm
|
||
|
- Discussion
|
||
|
- how can we make sure this isn't happening for ZOS v4
|
||
|
- we'd need a GEP to change the discount and rewards
|
||
|
- info_grid manual (github) to info_tfgrid manual (git.ourworld.tf) migration
|
||
|
- discuss how to do this smoothly
|
||
|
- e.g.
|
||
|
- replace info_grid manual by info_tfgrid manual on manual.grid.tf
|
||
|
- OR we wait for the new markdown docs app?
|